Results for 'commercial litigation team'
If you can't see what you are looking for, try our chat bot?
-
Case Update: Armstead v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company Ltd (2024) UKSC 6
In tort, it is a well-established principle that a person owes a duty of care not to cause any physical damage to another person’s property.
-
Warranty v Condition
Businesses and individuals alike enter into contracts frequently, whether it be for services or goods…
-
“You Knew Perfectly Well What You Were Signing”
Commercial Litigation Partner Kevin Rogers comments on a recent case where a Claimant (unsuccessfully) tried to claim that a transfer of the property was invalid because they’d ‘made a mistake’.
-
Does The University Of Cambridge Own ‘Cambridge’?
A recent legal battle between Tahl Holtzman and The University of Cambridge has brought to light challenges in trademark for companies based in Cambridge.
-
Settlement Agreements For Directors, Board Members and Senior Managers/Executives
Senior level Settlement Agreements. At Wilson Browne Solicitors, we have experience in advising senior executives, including Board members, directors, and shareholders, on negotiated exits.
-
Sigourney Moore
Trainee Solicitor
Sigourney is a third seat Trainee Solicitor in the Corporate and Commercial team based in our Northampton office
-
Protected: Training Council
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
-
Building and Property Disputes
Do you have a building dispute with a local authority, large national house builders or other contractor? We also help with Adverse Possession claims and Conveyancing Negligence claims.
-
Fortification of an Undertaking for Damages Explained
Some of the orders that can be made by the Court are an interim injunction (requiring someone to do or not do something. Rachel Leatherland explains the process.
-
The importance of identifying land benefiting from a restrictive covenant
In the recent case of Bath Rugby Ltd v Greenwood and others, the Court of Appeal found that a restrictive covenant that pre-dated the Law of Property Act 1925 had not been annexed to benefiting land, because the extent of that land had not been identified.