Contact one of our advisors now Call 0800 088 6004

Phone or video appointments available. Visitors by appointment only please. COVID19 risk assessment - CLICK HERE

Coronation Street Will Challenge

Reasons to choose Wilson Browne

The recent Coronation Street storyline involving the death of character Aiden Connor focussed on male depression and suicide…

…and the fact so often – as in the story – it is hidden from friends and family.

After his death – this is all fictional of course – Aiden’s last Will is found in which he leaves his “share” of Underworld, the factory on the cobbles, to his co-worker Alya Nazir. Of course, avid viewers will be aware that when Aiden wrote the Will he owned just 18% of the factory but at the date of his death he owned it all having been given the remaining 82% by Carla Connor in exchange for donating one of his kidneys to her.

Such twists and turns are the mainstay of the soap opera and keep fans tuning in week after week.

In the storyline, Aiden’s family want to retain the factory and are advised by a lawyer – Adam Barlow – to challenge the validity of the Will on the ground that Aiden Connor was not of sound mind when he executed the Will.

In the real world this argument would look at the legal definition of ‘sound mind’ – having the capacity to think, reason and understand for oneself. That would mean that Aiden needed to: –

  1. understand that he was making a will and its effects
  2. understand the extent of the property in his estate
  3. be aware of persons for whom he would usually be expected to provide (even if he chooses not to) and be free from any delusion of the mind that would cause him a reason not to benefit those people.

In the Coronation Street example, the fact that Aiden knew the extent of his property when he executed the Will is sufficient – if his interest in the factory changed later that is not relevant though it might have been sensible for him to review his Will when he was gifted the remaining share of the factory.

Whilst this storyline is not the best example of a basis upon which to challenge a Will it is a reminder that in certain circumstances a Will can be open to arguments that it is not valid. Other reasons for challenging a Will are

  • arguing that the Will was made under undue influence
  • that the Will or signatures to it are a fraud/forgery
  • that the Will has not been executed in accordance with legal requirements
  • that the Will itself does not reflect the instructions given to the solicitor

Aiden Connor’s case continues and we wait to see if the challenge to his Will can be successful or whether Alya Nazir will inherit the whole factory.

If you think that a Will needs to be challenged speak to our Specialist Team and we can advise you on the best approach.

Jennifer Laskey

Posted:

Jennifer Laskey

Partner

Jennifer is a Solicitor and Partner with 21 years experience advising clients in relation to litigated Will disputes. A Legal 500 recognised lawyer, Jennifer is a full member of ACTAPs and has resolved multi-million pound disputes for clients in Courts across England.